Grammar Tips & Articles »

Defamation vs. Slander vs. Libel

Read this Grammar.com article to learn about Defamation vs. Slander vs. Libel. Relax and enjoy!


5:15 min read
126 Views
  Teri Lapping  —  Grammar Tips
Font size:

Defamation vs. Slander vs. Libel

Defamation, slander, and libel are often used interchangeably, and their meanings are often confused. 

Do they mean the same thing?

These three terms belong to the same area of law and they all concern communication that falsely degrades the character of a person. 


What is Defamation

1. Defamation is the broadest of the three terms, and it refers to a false statement that is either spoken or printed. Defamation causes harm to the character of a person or a business, injuring their reputation without justification.
 

2. Slander and libel are both types of defamation. 

Slander” is when this defamation is spoken out loud. 

Libel” is when this defamation is made in writing.


3. Defamation is usually a civil offense as opposed to a criminal offense. 
 
There is often a fine distinction between a person’s constitutional right to “freedom of speech” and their right to make defamatory remarks that hurt another’s character or reputation. 

It is true that people have a right to speak their opinions, even when they are unpopular and even offensive. 

When a person uses defamatory statements and commits libel or slander, they are crossing that line that separates their constitutional rights from the unlawful act of injuring another person. 
  


What is Slander?


1. Slander is from the Middle English word sclaundren which means “to discredit, to defame”.

2. Slander is oral defamation. It is when someone says something false that does personal or economic damage to a person or a business. Although people have a constitutional right to express offensive and unpopular opinions, there is a legal line that can be crossed, and when that happens, slander is against the law.

3. There are five elements that must be present for something to be defined legally as slander:

The statement must be orally spoken to another party.

The statement must be presented as though it was fact and not just conjecture. 

The statement must contain elements that are harmful to a person or to the reputation of this person.

The statement must be shown to have caused personal or economic damage.

The statement must be shown to have been motivated by either a desire to harm or by negligence on the part of the accused slanderer.


An Example of Slander

During a PTA meeting in the local high school, a parent falsely claims that the principle has been charged with accepting a bribe. This is slander because this accusation was spoken out loud, it was communicated to a group of people, and it was shown to be a false accusation.


Another Example of Slander

A customer at a restaurant said out loud that the food was not tasty and that the service was horrible. These statements are their opinions. But then, this customer went on to falsely accuse the restaurant of serving food that was made with spoiled ingredients, causing other customers to leave the restaurant. This is now an example of slander because it was an untrue statement, it was spoken as though it was a fact, and it affected the business success of the restaurant. 



What is Libel?

1. Libel is derived from the Latin word libellus, or liber which means “book”.

2. Libel is written or broadcast defamation. Like slander, it is a statement that is false, and causes damage to a person’s reputation and financial situation, and it is done with an intent to harm. 

For example:

A magazine prints a story stating that a well-known athlete cheated on his wife with another celebrity. During the lawsuit, it was shown that the magazine only included aspects of the story that they believed to be accurate. The lawsuit was rejected because it could not be proven that the magazine had acted with an intent to actually harm the athlete, and so the magazine was protected by the First Amendment.


3. Libel can reach a wider range of people than slanderous words that are spoken and not documented. 

The written word can be published in newspapers, books, and social media, and it can be spread, republished, and stored in computerized memories that can continue to be accessed over time. 


4. All U.S. states have civil libel statutes, meaning you can sue those who have spread and published false statements about you. A few states also still have criminal libel laws on their books too.


5. There are two types of libel: “libel per se” and “libel per quod.”

*In Latin, the wordsper se” mean “on its face.”

 “Libel per serefers to statements that are overtly defamatory, such as statements that accuse someone of being a criminal, accuse someone of having a disease that is stigmatized, or a statement that accuses someone of behaving in an incompetent or criminal way in their work environment. 

The negative effects and harm resulting from libel per se is considered obvious and does not need to be proven legally.


*In Latin, the wordsper quod” mean “undercover.”

"Libel per quodrefers to statements that the underlying circumstances need to be explained in order to understand the significance.

Cases of “libel per se” are simpler to understand and prove in a court of law. Cases of “libel per quod” are much harder to prove because the facts are covert and less straight-forward.


Final Thoughts

Slander and Libel are both forms of defamation.

Slander refers to a false oral statement whereas libel refers to a false written statement.
 
In the early years of U.S. law, slander was thought to do more damage, because communication was usually spoken face-to-face, and literacy rates were lower. Later, with the rise of mass media and the written word, libel began to cause the most damage to a person and his reputation. 

Both types of defamation are civil offenses and have resulted in fines of various severity. In certain circumstances, defamation has been found to be a criminal offense, as well, and those found guilty have been sentenced to time in jail. 

Because a statement cannot be defamatory if it is true, truth serves as the ultimate defense.

Rate this article:

Have a discussion about this article with the community:

0 Comments

    Citation

    Use the citation below to add this article to your bibliography:

    Style:MLAChicagoAPA

    "Defamation vs. Slander vs. Libel." Grammar.com. STANDS4 LLC, 2024. Web. 25 Apr. 2024. <https://www.grammar.com/defamation_vs._slander_vs._libel>.

    Free, no signup required:

    Add to Chrome

    Check your text and writing for style, spelling and grammar problems everywhere on the web!

    Free, no signup required:

    Add to Firefox

    Check your text and writing for style, spelling and grammar problems everywhere on the web!

    Browse Grammar.com

    Free Writing Tool:

    Instant
    Grammar Checker

    Improve your grammar, vocabulary, and writing -- and it's FREE!


    Quiz

    Are you a grammar master?

    »
    Identify the sentence with correct use of the past perfect continuous tense:
    A She had been studying for hours before the exam.
    B He had sings a song for the audience.
    C We were visiting the museum all day.
    D I have played the piano yesterday.

    Improve your writing now:

    Download Grammar eBooks

    It’s now more important than ever to develop a powerful writing style. After all, most communication takes place in reports, emails, and instant messages.